Arrangement, keyword acquisition, and conjunction in a few types of Arabic

Arrangement, keyword acquisition, and conjunction in a few types of Arabic

  • ^ The five sandwich-variety of fillers was basically: crossbreed arrangement nouns having an effective possessive adjective (Julijin komsija “Julija’s neighbors,” in which komsija is end up in M otherwise F contract), as in (15b); crossbreed contract nouns with a beneficial possessive pronoun (moje cerekalo “my laugher,” where cerekalo can also be result in Yards otherwise N arrangement), such as (15c); NSg animate nouns that have an ordinal amount [prvo prase “(the) earliest pig,” in which prase has actually a hybrid plural means, creating FSg otherwise NPl contract], such as (15d); regular contract nouns having a beneficial MSg moderate match [uspeh dekana “(the) achievements (of) dean,” where in actuality the genitive complement is homonymous towards paucal, and paucal lets paucal and MPl arrangement], as with (15e); typical agreement MSg nouns that have a good PP match (prijatelj iz skole “the newest friend away from college or university,” where attraction effects might possibly be expected), like in (15f).
  • ^ New salience of one’s instances try managed on the following ways. First, one copywriter developed the latest instances based on the woman intuition, therefore the other evaluated her or him; in which conflict emerged, instances have been changed and the techniques is regular with the freshly introduced advice.
  • ^ The importance of the essential difference between arrangement activities inside the position try orthogonal on hypotheses from the attention of report, while they just build predictions towards relative quantity between your conditions, otherwise between the conditions and also the base-line rates. We declaration these screening with regard to completeness of your own statement, just like the informed by writers of the frequency.
  • ^ I have tailored and you will given an alternate experiment along these lines, and we also are currently considering the information and knowledge.

Records

Arsenijevic, B., and Mitic, We. (2016a). “Effect of animacy and you may agentivity towards handling regarding contract in Serbo-Croatian,” when you look at the Studies from inside the Dialects and you can Head, Picked documents away from 3rd Novi Sad Working area for the Psycholinguistics, Neurolinguistic and you may Logical Linguistic Research, eds S. Halupka-Resetar and you will S. Martinez-Ferreiro (Novi Sad: Professors off Beliefs), 41–77.

Arsenijevic, B., and you may Mitic, We. (2016b). Into the during the dependency off intercourse in terms of count when you look at the arrangement with coordinated victims: an experimental analysis. J. Slavic Linguist. twenty four, 41–69.

Ba). Morphology, arrangement and working thoughts recovery from inside the sentence development: proof off sex and you will case inside the Slovak. J. Mem. Lang. 56, 65–85.

Barber, H., and Carreiras, Meters. (2005). Grammatical gender and you can amount arrangement within the Spanish: An ERP evaluation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 137–153.

Bhatt, Roentgen., and you will Walkow, Meters. (2013). Discovering contract in sentence structure: a disagreement out of agreement in conjunctions. Nat. Lang. Linguist. Principle 31, 951–1013.

Bojovic, D. (2003). Neki slucajevi kongruencije koordinirane subjekatske sintagme s preponiranim i postponiranim predikatom you srpskom jeziku. Srpski Jezik 8, 539–555.

Lme4: Linear Combined-Outcomes Patterns Using S4 Groups

Carminati, M. (2005). Processing reactions of the ability steps (people > amount > gender) and you will implications getting linguistic idea. Lingua 115, 259–285.

Chomsky, N. (2001). “Derivation from the Stage,” for the Ken Hale. A lives in the Words, ed. Meters. Kenstowicz (Cambridge: MIT Drive), 1–52.

Citko, B. (2004). “Contract asymmetries when you look at the coordinate structures,” within the Authoritative Ways to Slavic linguistics: The newest Ottawa Meeting 2003, eds Good. Olga, W. Browne, cpsfnmM. Luisacpefnm Rivero, and you can D. Stojanovic (Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic E-books), 91–108.

De- Vincenzi, Yards. (1999). Differences when considering the fresh new morphology out-of intercourse and you can matter: facts from setting-up coreferences. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 28, 537–553.

De Vincenzi, Meters., and you will Di Domenico http://www.datingmentor.org/escort/roseville/, E. (1999). A change certainly ?-features: new character out-of gender and you will count throughout the recovery regarding pronoun antecedents. Ital. J. Linguist. eleven, 41–74.

Doron, Elizabeth. (2000). “VSO and you may left-conjunct arrangement : biblical Hebrew against. progressive Hebrew,” on the Syntax of your Verb First Languages, eds A great. Carnie and you will E. Guilfoyle (New york, NY: Oxford University Push), 75–96.

Voit ottaa minuun yhteyttä!